TY - JOUR
T1 - Actionable knowledge and the art of engagement
AU - Mach, Katharine J.
AU - Lemos, Maria Carmen
AU - Meadow, Alison M.
AU - Wyborn, Carina
AU - Klenk, Nicole
AU - Arnott, James C.
AU - Ardoin, Nicole M.
AU - Fieseler, Clare
AU - Moss, Richard H.
AU - Nichols, Leah
AU - Stults, Missy
AU - Vaughan, Catherine
AU - Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle
N1 - Funding Information:
This article was developed through, and greatly improved by, discussions within the Science of Actionable Knowledge (SOAK) group. In the development of this special issue, SOAK was convened through support from the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding received from the National Science Foundation ( DBI-1639145 ). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We thank Erica Johnston for assistance with figure preparation and reference management.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - What makes knowledge relevant to environmental sustainability actionable, and how can its societal impacts be evaluated? Scholars and practitioners have increasingly advocated that the traditional linear model of knowledge production, with its unidirectional flow of information from researchers to policy-makers, be replaced by a new approach in which researchers and knowledge-users meaningfully interact to co-create knowledge that is actionable in decision-making. This popular model — co-production — has advanced thinking on how to create usable knowledge. In practice, however, co-production has not been a single approach, but instead a diversity of forms of engaged research. Further, the jargon may both obfuscate governance dimensions and limit understanding of what works. Improved distinction among the different ways researchers and societal partners interact can enable attentive and effective engagement across contexts. Recognition of this diversity is necessary in advancing the processes and impacts of actionable knowledge for sustainability.
AB - What makes knowledge relevant to environmental sustainability actionable, and how can its societal impacts be evaluated? Scholars and practitioners have increasingly advocated that the traditional linear model of knowledge production, with its unidirectional flow of information from researchers to policy-makers, be replaced by a new approach in which researchers and knowledge-users meaningfully interact to co-create knowledge that is actionable in decision-making. This popular model — co-production — has advanced thinking on how to create usable knowledge. In practice, however, co-production has not been a single approach, but instead a diversity of forms of engaged research. Further, the jargon may both obfuscate governance dimensions and limit understanding of what works. Improved distinction among the different ways researchers and societal partners interact can enable attentive and effective engagement across contexts. Recognition of this diversity is necessary in advancing the processes and impacts of actionable knowledge for sustainability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076880939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076880939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.002
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85076880939
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 42
SP - 30
EP - 37
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
ER -