TY - JOUR
T1 - Acquiring environmental flows
T2 - ecological economics of policy development in western U.S.
AU - Colby, Bonnie
N1 - Funding Information:
I appreciate the thoughtful review and valuable suggestions provided by reviewers on an early draft when the Special Issue Ecological Economics of Water was being organized, as well as the insightful reviews arranged by Ecological Economics. I appreciate editing and assistance with references by Brian McGreal. I alone am responsible for any errors, or oversights in applying suggestions of these reviewers. I acknowledge funding provided by the Walton Family Foundation .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - The western U.S. faces trade-offs between providing water for urban, agricultural and industrial uses and allocating water to environmental needs. These competing uses have been the subject of many conflicts addressed by courts, legislatures and voluntary water trading arrangements. This paper draws upon Social Ecological Economics of Water (SEEW) and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory (PET) to evaluate the interdependent roles of voluntary transactions and mandates to provide environmental water. The article presents stages of maturation in water trading, and applies these to two evolving markets in the western U.S. Case studies of the Edwards Aquifer in Texas and the Colorado River Delta illustrate the interplay of voluntary water trading and compulsory reallocation. The cases highlight interdependencies among policy instruments and pathways of water policy innovation. The SEEW and PET frameworks shed light on persistent difficulties faced with developing markets to acquire water for environmental needs. The case studies demonstrate SEEW concepts of patrimony and power dynamics in considering why objections to voluntary water trading endure, even though water transactions are a valuable policy instrument. The case studies illustrate PET principles on the role of economic impetus in propelling policy innovation and on pivotal contributions by academics and NGOs.
AB - The western U.S. faces trade-offs between providing water for urban, agricultural and industrial uses and allocating water to environmental needs. These competing uses have been the subject of many conflicts addressed by courts, legislatures and voluntary water trading arrangements. This paper draws upon Social Ecological Economics of Water (SEEW) and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory (PET) to evaluate the interdependent roles of voluntary transactions and mandates to provide environmental water. The article presents stages of maturation in water trading, and applies these to two evolving markets in the western U.S. Case studies of the Edwards Aquifer in Texas and the Colorado River Delta illustrate the interplay of voluntary water trading and compulsory reallocation. The cases highlight interdependencies among policy instruments and pathways of water policy innovation. The SEEW and PET frameworks shed light on persistent difficulties faced with developing markets to acquire water for environmental needs. The case studies demonstrate SEEW concepts of patrimony and power dynamics in considering why objections to voluntary water trading endure, even though water transactions are a valuable policy instrument. The case studies illustrate PET principles on the role of economic impetus in propelling policy innovation and on pivotal contributions by academics and NGOs.
KW - Conflict resolution
KW - Environmental flows
KW - Institutions
KW - Markets
KW - Patrimony
KW - Punctuated Equilibrium Theory
KW - Social Ecological Economics of Water
KW - Water trading
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083004815&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083004815&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106655
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106655
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85083004815
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 173
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
M1 - 106655
ER -