TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of the Welch Allyn SureSight for measurement of magnitude of astigmatism in 3- to 7-year-old children
AU - Harvey, Erin M.
AU - Dobson, Velma
AU - Miller, Joseph M.
AU - Clifford-Donaldson, Candice E.
AU - Green, Tina K.
AU - Messer, Dawn H.
AU - Garvey, Katherine A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by grant U10 EY13153 (EMH) from the National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, and by Research to Prevent Blindness (unrestricted funds to the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science (JMM), a Walt and Lilly Disney Award for Amblyopia Research (JMM), and a Career Development Award (EMH)). The authors thank the Tohono O'odham Nation, the Tohono O'odham Early Childhood Headstart Program, the Indian Oasis/Baboquivari School District, the Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Indian Education Programs (BIA OIEP, Papago/Pima Agency), the San Xavier Mission School, the parents and children who participated in the study, and our NIH/NEI Data Monitoring and Oversight Committee [Robert Hardy, PhD (chair), Morgan Ashley, Donald Everett, MA, Jonathan Holmes, MD, Andrew Lorentine, and Karla Zadnik, OD, PhD].
PY - 2009/10
Y1 - 2009/10
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of the Welch Allyn SureSight in noncycloplegic measurements of astigmatism as compared to cycloplegic Retinomax K+ autorefractor measurements of astigmatism in children from a Native American population with a high prevalence of high astigmatism. Methods: Data are reported for 825 3- to 7-year-old children with no ocular abnormalities. Each child had a Retinomax K+ cycloplegic measurement of right eye astigmatism with a confidence rating ≥8 and 3 attempts to obtain a SureSight measurement on the right eye. Results: SureSight measurement success rates did not differ significantly across age or measurement confidence rating (<6 vs ≥6). Ninety-six percent of children had at least 1 measurement (any confidence), and 89% had at least 1 measurement with confidence at the manufacturer's recommended value (≥6). Overall, the SureSight tended to overestimate astigmatism. If the SureSight measurement had any dioptric value (0.00 D to 3.00 D), astigmatism of 2.00 D or less was likely to be present. If the SureSight showed astigmatism beyond the instrument's dioptric range (>3.00 D), Retinomax K+ measurements indicated that >2.00 D of astigmatism was present in 136 of 157 (86.6%). In cooperative children for whom the SureSight would not give a reading, 32 of 34 (94%) had >3.00 D of astigmatism. Conclusions: The SureSight does not provide an accurate, quantitative measure of amount of astigmatism. However, it does allow accurate categorization of amount of astigmatism as ≤2.00 D, >2.00 D, or >3.00 D, and it has high measurement success rate in young children.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of the Welch Allyn SureSight in noncycloplegic measurements of astigmatism as compared to cycloplegic Retinomax K+ autorefractor measurements of astigmatism in children from a Native American population with a high prevalence of high astigmatism. Methods: Data are reported for 825 3- to 7-year-old children with no ocular abnormalities. Each child had a Retinomax K+ cycloplegic measurement of right eye astigmatism with a confidence rating ≥8 and 3 attempts to obtain a SureSight measurement on the right eye. Results: SureSight measurement success rates did not differ significantly across age or measurement confidence rating (<6 vs ≥6). Ninety-six percent of children had at least 1 measurement (any confidence), and 89% had at least 1 measurement with confidence at the manufacturer's recommended value (≥6). Overall, the SureSight tended to overestimate astigmatism. If the SureSight measurement had any dioptric value (0.00 D to 3.00 D), astigmatism of 2.00 D or less was likely to be present. If the SureSight showed astigmatism beyond the instrument's dioptric range (>3.00 D), Retinomax K+ measurements indicated that >2.00 D of astigmatism was present in 136 of 157 (86.6%). In cooperative children for whom the SureSight would not give a reading, 32 of 34 (94%) had >3.00 D of astigmatism. Conclusions: The SureSight does not provide an accurate, quantitative measure of amount of astigmatism. However, it does allow accurate categorization of amount of astigmatism as ≤2.00 D, >2.00 D, or >3.00 D, and it has high measurement success rate in young children.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349964589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349964589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.08.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.08.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 19840726
AN - SCOPUS:70349964589
SN - 1091-8531
VL - 13
SP - 466
EP - 471
JO - Journal of AAPOS
JF - Journal of AAPOS
IS - 5
ER -