TY - JOUR
T1 - A topographical model of μ‐opioid and brain somatostatin receptor selective ligands NMR and molecular dynamics studies
AU - KAZMIFRSKI, WIESLAW M.
AU - FERGUSON, R. D.
AU - LIPKOWSKI, ANDRZEJ W.
AU - HRUBY, VICTOR J.
PY - 1995/9
Y1 - 1995/9
N2 - We have refined the 1H NMR‐based conformations of the μ‐opioid receptor selective peptides related to somatostatin of general formula Xxx‐Yyy1‐Cys‐Zzz‐D‐Trp‐Lys(Orn)5‐Thr‐Peh‐Thr8‐NH2, where Xxx, Yyy, Zzz are 0, d‐Phe and Tyr for 1; 0, d‐Tic and Tyr for 2; Gly, d‐Tic and Tyr for 3; and 0, d‐Phe and Tic for 4, respectively, (Kazmierski et al., J. Am. Chem. 113, 2275–2283), using a molecular‐dynamics approach. We present evidence that the NMR data are compatible with βII′‐, γ‐ and γ′‐turns for the central tetrapeptide Tyr‐D‐Trp‐Lys/Orn‐Thr. Based on detailed structural and topographical considerations, we suggest that the μ‐opioid receptor selectivity of 2 is due to a particular spatial arrangement of aromatic side chains of d‐Tic1 and Tyr3 (7.5 Å), and that the opioid receptor recognition domain is located in the N‐terminal part of the peptide while the somatostatin receptor recognition domain is determined by the central, turn forming part of this class of cyclic peptides. A model for a μ‐opioid selective ligand has emerged from these studies that shows excellent structural similarities to rigid opioid alkaloids.
AB - We have refined the 1H NMR‐based conformations of the μ‐opioid receptor selective peptides related to somatostatin of general formula Xxx‐Yyy1‐Cys‐Zzz‐D‐Trp‐Lys(Orn)5‐Thr‐Peh‐Thr8‐NH2, where Xxx, Yyy, Zzz are 0, d‐Phe and Tyr for 1; 0, d‐Tic and Tyr for 2; Gly, d‐Tic and Tyr for 3; and 0, d‐Phe and Tic for 4, respectively, (Kazmierski et al., J. Am. Chem. 113, 2275–2283), using a molecular‐dynamics approach. We present evidence that the NMR data are compatible with βII′‐, γ‐ and γ′‐turns for the central tetrapeptide Tyr‐D‐Trp‐Lys/Orn‐Thr. Based on detailed structural and topographical considerations, we suggest that the μ‐opioid receptor selectivity of 2 is due to a particular spatial arrangement of aromatic side chains of d‐Tic1 and Tyr3 (7.5 Å), and that the opioid receptor recognition domain is located in the N‐terminal part of the peptide while the somatostatin receptor recognition domain is determined by the central, turn forming part of this class of cyclic peptides. A model for a μ‐opioid selective ligand has emerged from these studies that shows excellent structural similarities to rigid opioid alkaloids.
KW - model
KW - molecular dynamics
KW - nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
KW - topographical model
KW - μ‐opioid antagonist
KW - μ‐opioid ligand from somatostatin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028971835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028971835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1995.tb00598.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1995.tb00598.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 8537180
AN - SCOPUS:0028971835
SN - 0367-8377
VL - 46
SP - 265
EP - 278
JO - International journal of peptide and protein research
JF - International journal of peptide and protein research
IS - 3-4
ER -