A timid response to the consequence argument

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In this paper, I challenge the Consequence Argument for Incompatibilism by arguing that the inference principle it relies upon is not well motivated. The sorts of non-question-begging instances that might be offered in support of it fall short.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-169
Number of pages15
JournalNous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues
Issue number1
StatePublished - Oct 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'A timid response to the consequence argument'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this