A statistical analysis of seeds and other high-contrast exoplanet surveys: Massive planets or low-mass brown dwarfs?

  • Timothy D. Brandt
  • , Michael W. McElwain
  • , Edwin L. Turner
  • , Kyle Mede
  • , David S. Spiegel
  • , Masayuki Kuzuhara
  • , Joshua E. Schlieder
  • , John P. Wisniewski
  • , L. Abe
  • , B. Biller
  • , W. Brandner
  • , J. Carson
  • , T. Currie
  • , S. Egner
  • , M. Feldt
  • , T. Golota
  • , M. Goto
  • , C. A. Grady
  • , O. Guyon
  • , J. Hashimoto
  • Y. Hayano, M. Hayashi, S. Hayashi, T. Henning, K. W. Hodapp, S. Inutsuka, M. Ishii, M. Iye, M. Janson, R. Kandori, G. R. Knapp, T. Kudo, N. Kusakabe, J. Kwon, T. Matsuo, S. Miyama, J. I. Morino, A. Moro-Martín, T. Nishimura, T. S. Pyo, E. Serabyn, H. Suto, R. Suzuki, M. Takami, N. Takato, H. Terada, C. Thalmann, D. Tomono, M. Watanabe, T. Yamada, H. Takami, T. Usuda, M. Tamura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We conduct a statistical analysis of a combined sample of direct imaging data, totalling nearly 250 stars. The stars cover a wide range of ages and spectral types, and include five detections (κ And b, two60 M J brown dwarf companions in the Pleiades, PZ Tel B, and CD-35 2722B). For some analyses we add a currently unpublished set of SEEDS observations, including the detections GJ 504b and GJ 758B. We conduct a uniform, Bayesian analysis of all stellar ages using both membership in a kinematic moving group and activity/rotation age indicators. We then present a new statistical method for computing the likelihood of a substellar distribution function. By performing most of the integrals analytically, we achieve an enormous speedup over brute-force Monte Carlo. We use this method to place upper limits on the maximum semimajor axis of the distribution function derived from radial-velocity planets, finding model-dependent values of30-100 AU. Finally, we model the entire substellar sample, from massive brown dwarfs to a theoretically motivated cutoff at5 M J, with a single power-law distribution. We find that p(M, a)M -0.65 ± 0.60 a -0.85 ± 0.39 (1σ errors) provides an adequate fit to our data, with 1.0%-3.1% (68% confidence) of stars hosting 5-70 M J companions between 10 and 100 AU. This suggests that many of the directly imaged exoplanets known, including most (if not all) of the low-mass companions in our sample, formed by fragmentation in a cloud or disk, and represent the low-mass tail of the brown dwarfs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number159
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume794
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 20 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • brown dwarfs
  • methods: statistical
  • open clusters and associations: general
  • planetary systems
  • stars: activity
  • stars: imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A statistical analysis of seeds and other high-contrast exoplanet surveys: Massive planets or low-mass brown dwarfs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this