TY - JOUR
T1 - A new view of insect-crustacean relationships I. Inferences from neural cladistics and comparative neuroanatomy
AU - Strausfeld, Nicholas J.
AU - Andrew, David R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Two reviewers provided extremely helpful comments that improved the manuscripts, and we thank them both. We are grateful to Dr. Sheena Brown for letting us use information from serial sections of specimens of Tigriopus californicus (Brown et al., in preparation). Research for this project was in part supported by an IGERT fellowship in comparative genomics to DA, from the University of Arizona Graduate Program in Genomics, and grants from the center for Insect Science (DA) , and funds originally generated from a John T. and Catherine D. MacArthur Fellowship to NJS. We also gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the Staff of the University of Washington’s Friday Harbor Marine Laboratory. Appendix
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - Traditional hypotheses regarding the relationships of the major arthropod lineages focus on suites of comparable characters, often those that address features of the exoskeleton. However, because of the enormous morphological variety among arthropods, external characters may lead to ambiguities of interpretation and definition, particularly when species have undergone evolutionary simplification and reversal. Here we present the results of a cladistic analysis using morphological characters associated with brains and central nervous systems, based on the evidence that cerebral organization is generally robust over geological time. Well-resolved, strongly supported phylogenies were obtained from a neuromorphological character set representing a variety of discrete neuroanatomical traits. Phylogenetic hypotheses from this analysis support many accepted relationships, including monophyletic Chelicerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda, paraphyletic Crustacea and the union of Hexapoda and Crustacea (Tetraconata). They also support Mandibulata (Myriapoda + Tetraconata). One problematic result, which can be explained by symplesiomorphies that are likely to have evolved in deep time, is the inability to resolve Onychophora as a taxon distinct from Arthropoda. Crucially, neuronal cladistics supports the heterodox conclusion that both Hexapoda and Malacostraca are derived from a common ancestor that possessed a suite of discrete neural centers comprising an elaborate brain. Remipedes and copepods, both resolved as basal to Branchiopoda share a neural ground pattern with Malacostraca. These findings distinguish Hexapoda (Insecta) from Branchiopoda, which is the sister group of the clade Malacostraca + Hexapoda. The present study resolves branchiopod crustaceans as descendents of an ancestor with a complex brain, which means that they have evolved secondary simplification and the loss or reduction of numerous neural systems.
AB - Traditional hypotheses regarding the relationships of the major arthropod lineages focus on suites of comparable characters, often those that address features of the exoskeleton. However, because of the enormous morphological variety among arthropods, external characters may lead to ambiguities of interpretation and definition, particularly when species have undergone evolutionary simplification and reversal. Here we present the results of a cladistic analysis using morphological characters associated with brains and central nervous systems, based on the evidence that cerebral organization is generally robust over geological time. Well-resolved, strongly supported phylogenies were obtained from a neuromorphological character set representing a variety of discrete neuroanatomical traits. Phylogenetic hypotheses from this analysis support many accepted relationships, including monophyletic Chelicerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda, paraphyletic Crustacea and the union of Hexapoda and Crustacea (Tetraconata). They also support Mandibulata (Myriapoda + Tetraconata). One problematic result, which can be explained by symplesiomorphies that are likely to have evolved in deep time, is the inability to resolve Onychophora as a taxon distinct from Arthropoda. Crucially, neuronal cladistics supports the heterodox conclusion that both Hexapoda and Malacostraca are derived from a common ancestor that possessed a suite of discrete neural centers comprising an elaborate brain. Remipedes and copepods, both resolved as basal to Branchiopoda share a neural ground pattern with Malacostraca. These findings distinguish Hexapoda (Insecta) from Branchiopoda, which is the sister group of the clade Malacostraca + Hexapoda. The present study resolves branchiopod crustaceans as descendents of an ancestor with a complex brain, which means that they have evolved secondary simplification and the loss or reduction of numerous neural systems.
KW - Branchiopoda
KW - Character loss
KW - Cladistics
KW - Evolution
KW - Insecta
KW - Malacostraca
KW - Neuroanatomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958817190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958817190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.asd.2011.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.asd.2011.02.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 21333750
AN - SCOPUS:79958817190
SN - 1467-8039
VL - 40
SP - 276
EP - 288
JO - Arthropod Structure and Development
JF - Arthropod Structure and Development
IS - 3
ER -