A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: A pilot study

Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Merce Comas, Leia Garrote Gallego, Behalf Of The Gismar Group On Behalf Of The Gismar Group, Sergio Serrano, Belén Lloveras, Ignasi Tusquets, Maria Vernet-Tomas, Ana Rodríguez, Mar Iglesias, Laia Serrano, Joan Albanell, Rodrigo Alcántara, Xavier Castells, Inma Collet, Laura Comerma, Fernando Fernández, Valentí Juncà, Juan Martínez, Maria MartínezTamara Martos, Antoni Mestre-Fusco, Pau Nicolau, Francisco Plancarte, Noemí Rodríguez, Javier Sanz, Marcel Segura, Sònia Servitja, Ivonne Vázquez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


Background: Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. Materials and Methods: Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. Results: A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. Conclusions: The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number26
JournalJournal of Pathology Informatics
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018


  • Software platform
  • task analysis
  • tumor board preparation
  • user satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications


Dive into the research topics of 'A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: A pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this