TY - JOUR
T1 - A New Sediment Accumulation Model of Cenozoic Depositional Ages From the Qaidam Basin, Tibetan Plateau
AU - Cheng, Feng
AU - Garzione, Carmala
AU - Jolivet, Marc
AU - Guo, Zhaojie
AU - Zhang, Daowei
AU - Zhang, Changhao
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation (EAR- 1348005 and OISE-1545859) to Garzione, Open project fund from State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, CAS (SKLLQG1701) to Cheng and National Science and Technology Major Project of China (grant 2017ZX05008-001) to Guo. Permission of Qinghai Oilfield Company, PetroChina, for publication of reflection seismic data in Figures 10 and 11 and isopach data in Figures 7 is acknowledged. SRTM digital topography is from http://www. gscloud.cn. Data supporting this paper are available in Text S1 and Data Sets S1–S9. We declare no competing financial interests. Insightful comments and guidance from Editor in Chief Bryn Hubbard, anonymous Associate Editor, Kendra Murray, Andrew Laskowski, and an anonymous reviewer are gratefully acknowledged.
Funding Information:
The research was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation (EAR-1348005 and OISE-1545859) to Garzione, Open project fund from State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, CAS (SKLLQG1701) to Cheng and National Science and Technology Major Project of China (grant 2017ZX05008-001) to Guo. Permission of Qinghai Oilfield Company, PetroChina, for publication of reflection seismic data in Figures 10 and 11 and isopach data in Figures 7 is acknowledged. SRTM digital topography is from http://www.gscloud.cn. Data supporting this paper are available in Text S1 and Data Sets S1–S9. We declare no competing financial interests. Insightful comments and guidance from Editor in Chief Bryn Hubbard, anonymous Associate Editor, Kendra Murray, Andrew Laskowski, and an anonymous reviewer are gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
©2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Two debated age models, with a basal age of ~50 Ma versus ~30 Ma, are proposed for the depositional age of Cenozoic strata within the Qaidam basin result in a diverse understanding of the initial pattern of deformation in the northern Tibetan Plateau. To evaluate these age models, we integrated isopach maps within the basin with published thermochronology data from surrounding ranges to balance the sediments preserved in the basin with materials eroded in the drainage area. When following the traditional ~50 Ma age model, the total volume of material eroded from the surrounding source area is 4.4 ± 0.3 × 105 km3. Using instead the ~30 Ma age model for the basal Lulehe Formation and related revisions to the basin chronology, the volume of eroded material is calculated at 3.5 ± 0.2 × 105 km3, which provides a better match to the calculated total volume of solid grains that are preserved in the basin (2.8 ± 0.1 × 105 km3). However, growth strata revealed in seismic profiles along the Southern Qaidam Thrust suggest reverse-faulting began during the deposition of Oligocene-Miocene strata. Following the ~50 Ma age model, the onset time of faulting along the Southern Qaidam Thrust is ~35.5 Ma, consistent with previous thermochronology results. If both age models are correct, then this requires a significant time-transgressive nature to basin fill that allows for older ages of deposition in the southern part of the basin. This study highlights the need for further effort to determine the depositional age of the strata in the southern and western parts of the Qaidam basin.
AB - Two debated age models, with a basal age of ~50 Ma versus ~30 Ma, are proposed for the depositional age of Cenozoic strata within the Qaidam basin result in a diverse understanding of the initial pattern of deformation in the northern Tibetan Plateau. To evaluate these age models, we integrated isopach maps within the basin with published thermochronology data from surrounding ranges to balance the sediments preserved in the basin with materials eroded in the drainage area. When following the traditional ~50 Ma age model, the total volume of material eroded from the surrounding source area is 4.4 ± 0.3 × 105 km3. Using instead the ~30 Ma age model for the basal Lulehe Formation and related revisions to the basin chronology, the volume of eroded material is calculated at 3.5 ± 0.2 × 105 km3, which provides a better match to the calculated total volume of solid grains that are preserved in the basin (2.8 ± 0.1 × 105 km3). However, growth strata revealed in seismic profiles along the Southern Qaidam Thrust suggest reverse-faulting began during the deposition of Oligocene-Miocene strata. Following the ~50 Ma age model, the onset time of faulting along the Southern Qaidam Thrust is ~35.5 Ma, consistent with previous thermochronology results. If both age models are correct, then this requires a significant time-transgressive nature to basin fill that allows for older ages of deposition in the southern part of the basin. This study highlights the need for further effort to determine the depositional age of the strata in the southern and western parts of the Qaidam basin.
KW - Cenozoic
KW - Qaidam basin
KW - Tibetan Plateau
KW - basin fill
KW - depositional age
KW - erosion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057532632&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057532632&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2018JF004645
DO - 10.1029/2018JF004645
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85057532632
SN - 2169-9003
VL - 123
SP - 3101
EP - 3121
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
IS - 11
ER -