TY - JOUR
T1 - A mathematical model for comparison of bolus injection, continuous infusion, and liposomal delivery of doxorubicin to tumor cells
AU - El-Kareh, A. W.
AU - Secomb, T. W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Address all correspondence to: Dr. Timothy W. Secomb, PhD, Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724 -5051. E-mail: [email protected] 1This work was supported by a grant from the Whitaker Foundation, and NIH/National Cancer Institute grant CA40355. Received 30 December 1999; Accepted 11 February 2000.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Determining the optimal mode of delivery for doxorubicin is important given the wide use of the drug against many tumor types. The relative performances of bolus injection, continuous infusion, liposomal and thermoliposomal delivery are not yet definitely established from clinical trials. Here, a mathematical model is used to compare bolus injection, continuous infusion for various durations, liposomal and thermoliposomal delivery of doxorubicin. Effects of the relatively slow rate, and saturability, of doxorubicin uptake by cells are included. Peak concentrations attained in tumor cells are predicted and used as a measure of antitumor effectiveness. To measure toxicity, plasma area under the curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentrations of free doxorubicin are computed. For continuous infusion, the duration of infusion significantly affects predicted outcome. The optimal infusion duration increases with dose, and is in the range 1 to 3 hours at typical doses. The simulations suggest that continuous infusion for optimal durations is superior to the other protocols. Nonthermosensitive liposomes approach the efficacy of continuous infusion only if they release drug at optimal rates. Predictions for thermosensitive liposomes indicate a potential advantage at some doses, but only if hyperthermia is applied locally so that the blood is not significantly heated.
AB - Determining the optimal mode of delivery for doxorubicin is important given the wide use of the drug against many tumor types. The relative performances of bolus injection, continuous infusion, liposomal and thermoliposomal delivery are not yet definitely established from clinical trials. Here, a mathematical model is used to compare bolus injection, continuous infusion for various durations, liposomal and thermoliposomal delivery of doxorubicin. Effects of the relatively slow rate, and saturability, of doxorubicin uptake by cells are included. Peak concentrations attained in tumor cells are predicted and used as a measure of antitumor effectiveness. To measure toxicity, plasma area under the curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentrations of free doxorubicin are computed. For continuous infusion, the duration of infusion significantly affects predicted outcome. The optimal infusion duration increases with dose, and is in the range 1 to 3 hours at typical doses. The simulations suggest that continuous infusion for optimal durations is superior to the other protocols. Nonthermosensitive liposomes approach the efficacy of continuous infusion only if they release drug at optimal rates. Predictions for thermosensitive liposomes indicate a potential advantage at some doses, but only if hyperthermia is applied locally so that the blood is not significantly heated.
KW - Continuous infusion
KW - Doxorubicin
KW - Drug delivery
KW - Liposome
KW - Tumor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033822142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033822142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/sj.neo.7900096
DO - 10.1038/sj.neo.7900096
M3 - Article
C2 - 11005567
AN - SCOPUS:0033822142
SN - 1522-8002
VL - 2
SP - 325
EP - 338
JO - Neoplasia
JF - Neoplasia
IS - 4
ER -