TY - JOUR
T1 - A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts
T2 - An extension of terror management theory
AU - Pyszczynski, Tom
AU - Solomon, Sheldon
AU - Greenberg, Jeff
PY - 1999/10
Y1 - 1999/10
N2 - Distinct defensive processes are activated by conscious and nonconscious but accessible thoughts of death. Proximal defenses, which entail suppressing death-related thoughts or pushing the problem of death into the distant future by denying one's vulnerability, are rational, threat-focused, and activated when thoughts of death are in current focal attention. Distal terror management defenses, which entail maintaining self-esteem and faith in one's cultural worldview, function to control the potential for anxiety that results from knowing that death is inevitable. These defenses are experiential, are not related to the problem of death in any semantic or logical way, and are increasingly activated as the accessibility of death-related thoughts increases, up to the point at which such thoughts enter consciousness and proximal threat-focused defenses are initiated. Experimental evidence for this analysis is presented.
AB - Distinct defensive processes are activated by conscious and nonconscious but accessible thoughts of death. Proximal defenses, which entail suppressing death-related thoughts or pushing the problem of death into the distant future by denying one's vulnerability, are rational, threat-focused, and activated when thoughts of death are in current focal attention. Distal terror management defenses, which entail maintaining self-esteem and faith in one's cultural worldview, function to control the potential for anxiety that results from knowing that death is inevitable. These defenses are experiential, are not related to the problem of death in any semantic or logical way, and are increasingly activated as the accessibility of death-related thoughts increases, up to the point at which such thoughts enter consciousness and proximal threat-focused defenses are initiated. Experimental evidence for this analysis is presented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033211436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033211436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835
DO - 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835
M3 - Article
C2 - 10560330
AN - SCOPUS:0033211436
SN - 0033-295X
VL - 106
SP - 835
EP - 845
JO - Psychological Review
JF - Psychological Review
IS - 4
ER -