A comparison of three infiltration models.

B. N. Wilson; D. C. Slack; R. A. Young

A comparison of three infiltration models.

B. N. Wilson
, D. C. Slack
, R. A. Young

Biosystems Engineering-Ext

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Three physically based infiltration models are compared both in terms of theoretical development and performance. The models are an unmodified Green-Ampt-Mein-Larson (GAML-UNMOD) model, a similar model which was modified to account for entrapped air (GAML-ETA model) and a model which considers both air entrapment and air resistance effects (GAML-ART model). -from Authors

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	349-356
Number of pages	8
Journal	Transactions of the ASABE
Volume	25
Issue number	2
State	Published - 1982

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{2a079a3b358b497e99ee103995c7478f,

title = "A comparison of three infiltration models.",

abstract = "Three physically based infiltration models are compared both in terms of theoretical development and performance. The models are an unmodified Green-Ampt-Mein-Larson (GAML-UNMOD) model, a similar model which was modified to account for entrapped air (GAML-ETA model) and a model which considers both air entrapment and air resistance effects (GAML-ART model). -from Authors",

author = "Wilson, \{B. N.\} and Slack, \{D. C.\} and Young, \{R. A.\}",

year = "1982",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "25",

pages = "349--356",

journal = "Transactions of the ASABE",

issn = "2151-0032",

publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of three infiltration models.

AU - Wilson, B. N.

AU - Slack, D. C.

AU - Young, R. A.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - Three physically based infiltration models are compared both in terms of theoretical development and performance. The models are an unmodified Green-Ampt-Mein-Larson (GAML-UNMOD) model, a similar model which was modified to account for entrapped air (GAML-ETA model) and a model which considers both air entrapment and air resistance effects (GAML-ART model). -from Authors

AB - Three physically based infiltration models are compared both in terms of theoretical development and performance. The models are an unmodified Green-Ampt-Mein-Larson (GAML-UNMOD) model, a similar model which was modified to account for entrapped air (GAML-ETA model) and a model which considers both air entrapment and air resistance effects (GAML-ART model). -from Authors

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0020332307

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0020332307#tab=citedBy

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0020332307

SN - 2151-0032

VL - 25

SP - 349

EP - 356

JO - Transactions of the ASABE

JF - Transactions of the ASABE

IS - 2

ER -

A comparison of three infiltration models.

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this