Abstract
The study of faunal remains from archaeological sites has been described using a variety of terms including: Zooarchaeology, archaeozoology, osteoarchaeology, and ethnozoology. With such a broad spectrum of terms in current usage, we feel that the contradictions and errors inherent in some of this nomenclature need to be corrected. We prefer the term zooarchaeology, as a contraction of the word zoologico-archaeology proposed by Lubbock in 1865, to define the study of animal remains from archaeological sites and their relationship to humans.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 192-194 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | American Antiquity |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1981 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Archaeology
- Museology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comment on nomenclature in faunal studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS