Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A call for benchmarking transposable element annotation methods

  • Douglas R. Hoen
  • , Glenn Hickey
  • , Guillaume Bourque
  • , Josep Casacuberta
  • , Richard Cordaux
  • , Cédric Feschotte
  • , Anna Sophie Fiston-Lavier
  • , Aurélie Hua-Van
  • , Robert Hubley
  • , Aurélie Kapusta
  • , Emmanuelle Lerat
  • , Florian Maumus
  • , David D. Pollock
  • , Hadi Quesneville
  • , Arian Smit
  • , Travis J. Wheeler
  • , Thomas E. Bureau
  • , Mathieu Blanchette

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

DNA derived from transposable elements (TEs) constitutes large parts of the genomes of complex eukaryotes, with major impacts not only on genomic research but also on how organisms evolve and function. Although a variety of methods and tools have been developed to detect and annotate TEs, there are as yet no standard benchmarks - that is, no standard way to measure or compare their accuracy. This lack of accuracy assessment calls into question conclusions from a wide range of research that depends explicitly or implicitly on TE annotation. In the absence of standard benchmarks, toolmakers are impeded in improving their tools, annotators cannot properly assess which tools might best suit their needs, and downstream researchers cannot judge how accuracy limitations might impact their studies. We therefore propose that the TE research community create and adopt standard TE annotation benchmarks, and we call for other researchers to join the authors in making this long-overdue effort a success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number13
JournalMobile DNA
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 4 2015
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A call for benchmarking transposable element annotation methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this