Scholarly Works per year
Scholarly Works per year
- 10 results
Search results
-
2023
Correction: Where are the Coconspirators?: Examining Performative Youth Allyship and Opposition by Educational Leaders in K-12 Schools (The Urban Review, (2023), 55, 5, (559-582), 10.1007/s11256-023-00661-w)
Domínguez, A. D. & Bertrand, M., Dec 2023, In: Urban Review. 55, 5, p. 583 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Open Access -
2022
How China–US collaborations still happen, despite politics
Lee, J. J., Jul 21 2022, In: Nature. 607, 7919, p. 423 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Open Access2 Scopus citations -
2021
Commentary disrupting the big lie: Higher education and whitelash in a post/colorblind era
Whitehead, M. A., Foste, Z., Duran, A., Tevis, T. & Cabrera, N. L., 2021, In: Education Sciences. 11, 9, 486.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Open Access7 Scopus citations -
2011
Countering the fear
Rhoades, G., Jan 2011, In: Academe. 97, 1, p. 47 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
-
2010
Academia without the AAUP
Rhoades, G., Jul 2010, In: Academe. 96, 4, p. 47 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
-
A faculty voice
Rhoades, G., Jan 2010, In: Academe. 96, 1, p. 55 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
-
Private models, public costs
Rhoades, G., Nov 2010, In: Academe. 96, 6, p. 63 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
-
2009
From the general secretary: "National"
Rhoades, G., 2009, In: Academe. 95, 5, p. 71 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
-
Labor and capital,working for vou
Rhoades, G., Mar 2009, In: Academe. 95, 2, p. 111 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
-
What the AAUP stands for
Rhoades, G., Nov 2009, In: Academe. 95, 6, p. 119 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review